Your “journalists” should either holster there keyboard or check their activism and if they don’t know what they’re talking about it they shouldn’t talk about it.
Example, and it’s an old trick from the alarmists when they either don’t know the difference or deliberately conflate carbon and particulates (as from a wood burning fire) and Co2, a clear colourless and odourless trace gas.
Case in point, Jacqueline Maley, climate catastrophist, activist, alarmist and clueless.
“…Kelly says people will be forced to burn wood in their homes because they can’t afford to turn on their heaters, which will lead to increased air pollution. Kelly’s logic is spectacular in its circularity – note he is actually admitting that burning carbon is toxic to humans, but no way is he letting that sway him into thinking we might want to come up with a few alternatives to burning it globally, on a massive scale…” Jacqueline Maley’s Climate Hysterics