Select Page

In the 18th century, when English writer Samuel Johnson remarked thatย  โ€œ๐ฉ๐š๐ญ๐ซ๐ข๐จ๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฆ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฅ๐š๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ซ๐ž๐Ÿ๐ฎ๐ ๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฌ๐œ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ซ๐ž๐ฅโ€, he could just as easily have been talking about the voice and these shrieks of racism being the last roll of the dice, the last refuge of a desperate Yes campaign.

It is such a wah, wah, wah, infantile playground accusation.

As if individuals with agency canโ€™t make up their own minds based on the available facts and information before them.

And therein lies the problem for the Yes proponents. Facts and information. Or lack of them.

The problem for the yes proponents is that theyโ€™ve been trying to get in under the radar with as little detail and as few facts as possible.

This tactic simply raises the index of suspicion as to their true motives.

Its a hard NO