I’ve said for decades that if you were ever to seek an example of the deceptive and slippery language of the left which in fact means the exact opposite but sounds so warm, fuzzy and inclusive, the phrase, โ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐กโ is the gold standard.
Itโs not. It never has been.
Itโs an absurd motto and belief conjured and created to buttress that other hoax known as multiculturalism.
Multiculturalism is in effect apartheid.
The rich and vibrant tapestry use to be about the dress, the dance and the cuisine but in the shadow of Bondi, itโs all too apparent that others see it as a sign not of a quality to be reciprocated but a weakness to be exploited.
That youโre not proud of your culture or your history. Germany, France, Britain, all of Europe anyone?
Like all โismsโ multiculturalism was always a clunky and ugly political tool designed to create division. It was a forerunner to what we call today โidentity politicsโ and ripe for political exploitation. When other cultures arrive and feel no compunction or obligation to assimilate and acculturate but to live apart and not adopt the host nations values and traditions you become balkanised.
You become a nation of tribes.
The seal of the United States contains the Latin, โ ๐ ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ง๐ฎ๐ฆโ โ ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐ง ๐๐จ๐ซ โ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐จ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ฒ, ๐จ๐ง๐โ and thatโs as it should be.
But more and more in the early 21st century that aspirational Latin phrase has been turned on its head and now means not, out of many, one, but out of many, many.
And itโs all political. Itโs basically a turbocharged version of multiculturalism where people are recognised for what they are, not who they are.
Nothing wrong with diversity in and of itself, but as a political tool, which is how it is now being weaponised it equals atomisation and Balkanisation. It’s become about division not diversity.