Select Page
In the words of Democrat operative Rahm Emmanuel, โ€œ๐๐ž๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ ๐ฅ๐ž๐ญ ๐š ๐ฌ๐ž๐ซ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐œ๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ ๐จ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฐ๐š๐ฌ๐ญ๐žโ€.
In other words, see it as an opportunity to do things differently and as an opportunity to do things you thought you couldnโ€™t do before.
Reframe your dilemma through the prism of, out of chaos comes opportunity.
Now that the coalition is a mere husk of the robust political force it once was, they should adopt the policy of, totally cornering and owning the market on energy or at least the only energy market that matters.
Just as Labor owns Medicare they also, at the moment own renewable energy.
And that is their Achilles heel.
The American economist and presidential adviser of the mid-70’s Herb Stein once said in a statement of the obvious: “๐ฐ๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐œ๐š๐ง’๐ญ ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ฎ๐ž ๐ฐ๐จ๐ง’๐ญ”. .
The underlying principle of this tautological observation is that if a trend, fashion or fad is ๐ข๐ง๐ก๐ž๐ซ๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ง๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ข๐ง๐š๐›๐ฅ๐ž it will eventually cease, collapse or reverse.
And this is the dilemma that Australia and particularly Labor, will eventually have to deal with because renewable energy subsidies are both economically and more particularly politcally, ๐ข๐ง๐ก๐ž๐ซ๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ง๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ข๐ง๐š๐›๐ฅ๐ž
For the right of centre parties, renewable energy is the point of entry that they should seriously prod, probe, exploit and war-game with a view to eventually putting them out of business.
As energy is the basis of everything in a modern economy (not just electricity) but also in such a large land mass as Australia, road transport, shipping, aviation and agriculture, their entire focus must be in the enrgy space.
The stuff arrives on to the shelves at Woolies on the back of a truck the farmer gets his dairy, wheat and wool to market by road and rail.
Nothing moves without energy and the right of centre must own it.
Labor is in the unenviable position that they own the renewable sector but renewables, as we all know are only sustainable with subsidies and subject to the vagaries of the weather.
It can’t be repeated often enough: ๐˜๐จ๐ฎ ๐œ๐š๐งโ€™๐ญ ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ง ๐š ๐Ÿ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฅ-๐ญ๐ข๐ฆ๐ž ๐ž๐œ๐จ๐ง๐จ๐ฆ๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐ฉ๐š๐ซ๐ญ ๐ญ๐ข๐ฆ๐ž ๐ž๐ง๐ž๐ซ๐ ๐ฒ.
In fact, with renewables, weโ€™re paying twice. Once with our outrageous electricity bills and again via our taxes with the renewable subsidies.
The conservative forces should quit the โ€œme tooโ€ net zero scam, walkaway and into the embrace of nuclear. But just as, or even more importantly, hammer the point that everyoneโ€™s electricity bill and everything in general is higher today and even higher tomorrow because of renewable energy and the renewable energy subsidies.
If, as the left continues to gaslight Australians, with the bogus argument that renewables are cheaper than coal, gas and nuclear then they donโ€™t need subsidies.Theyโ€™re cheaper right? Wrong?
The beautiful thing about it is that unlike Labor and their perennial “Mediscare” campaigns conservatives only need to highlight the truth of actual energy costs because theyโ€™re very real and everyone, through their own bitter experience, knows all to well, that they are very real.
Just as Albo at every campaign whistle stop pulls out his Medicare card the opposition leader should personalise it and pull out a previous and current electricity bill for comparison, of random but very real families from across Australia and read them to the gaggle of waiting press.
That would humanise and personalise the issue for all Australians and the conservatives would own energy.