Select Page

Follow me on this train of logic..

This has been going around for a week or so where the sex discrimination commissioner in senate estimates in Canberra ย says โ€œ๐ˆ ๐๐จ๐งโ€™๐ญ ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ฆ ๐›๐ข๐จ๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ข๐œ๐š๐ฅ ๐ฆ๐š๐ฅ๐žโ€

Even after a week, itโ€™s impossible to wrap your head around such a profoundly dumb statement.

What are her qualifications for the job? How did she get the job?

๐๐”๐“ if the sex discrimination commissioner doesnโ€™t understand the term biological male, she, ipso facto, doesnโ€™t understand the term biological female.

If she doesnโ€™t understand the biology of either, how can she head up an organisation whereby such an understanding of sex/biology of both is central to her position?

It is that very difference that is the reason the commission was created in the first place (ie) discrimination based on that biological difference.

It would be like the head of the human rights commission saying he doesnโ€™t understand the term human and if he canโ€™t say what a human is he canโ€™t say what a human right is which again, is central to his position as head of the human rights commission.