Blog
Random Notes - Idle ThoughtsGreens confirm: Gay marriage is just the start — Andrew Bolt
Joel Dignam lead organiser of the ACT Greens: “..Queer campaigners should not win their rights by meekly trudging into the tent of patriarchal marriage, their tails between their legs. Rather, the same-sex marriage campaign can be about dismantling the walls of the tent, expanding it to be open to more of us, and continuing to liberalise this cultural institution..”
Random Note #187,562 — Equality has already been legislated, so what’s the real agenda?
This was further tidied up in 2008 by the Rudd Government with the passing of the Same-Sex Relationships (Equal Treatment in Commonwealth Law Reform) Act. That being the case, why is this debate being allowed by the media to pivot on the mindless, useful idiot mantra of “marriage equality” when it’s quite apparent that equality has already been achieved? One can only suspect that the deceptive use of the word equality is simply a semantic, marketing tool, designed to appeal to the average Australians innate sense of decency when in fact it’s a stalking horse to establish a beachhead for a much broader and expansive agenda
Random Note #178,692 — When all else fails and you can’t articulate, scream racist.
Thanks but no thanks to third-year medical student Carolyn O’Neil for giving us the benefit of her wisdom, but her attempts to badger, browbeat and name call those that are against gay marriage and compare them to racists is literally, in her case, undergraduate and juvenile. It is typical of the indulged, cosseted and cloistered, campus mindset, where everyone agrees with everyone else, and much of what passes for considered and rational debate from those of limited to no life experience.
Because of their bubble like existence and exposure to the real world, they lack the ability to articulate an argument and immediately reach for the racist epithet whilst refusing to countenance or tolerate countervailing points of view. I mean, why stop there? While she’s throwing her toys out of the cot, why not go the entire “Godwin’s Law” and throw in Nazi for good measure.
Random Note #189,542 – Electricity and a thumb on the scale.
With the $3 billion government subsidies to renewables annually, the government IS in the electricity business, the government IS fixing and interfering in the private market and the government IS picking winners with a thumb on the scale to advantage renewables and to the detriment of and to the disadvantage of cheap coal and electricity consumers. (ie) every single Australian
Random Note #195,731 — Agenda: Grinding America Down (The West)
For many years I’ve been of the view that just because the Berlin Wall had come down in the late 80’s early 90’s didn’t mean that communism was dead. It never really went away and still has a pulse and is very much alive and will use whatever means including the Gramsci and Frankfurt School (both mentioned and discussed in the first 30 minutes as is Saul Alinsky) tactic of infesting all the educational, social and cultural institutions of the West to undermine and destroy from within and further their agenda.
Random Note #197,562 — Rules for Radicals: Pick the target, freeze it, personalise it
The vicious attack by the proponents of the yes campaign on Dr Pansy Lai, like the attack on Margaret Court before her, was an exercise of the blunt instrument of Saul Alinsky’s 1971 call to arms “Rules for Radicals”. Rule 12 states simply: “..Pick the target, freeze it, personalise it, and polarise it. Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions..” It’s worth noting in the current climate with the toxic bullying coming from the yes proponents as illustrated against Dr Lai and Margaret Court and the street violence in the US by ANTIFA, that both Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama were both acolytes of Alinsky with Obama carrying on Alinsky’s work on the streets of Chicago as a community organiser. Clinton wrote her final year essay at Wellesley College on Alinsky and was granted the privilege of previewing the manuscript of Rules for Radicals before it was published
Random Note #189,652 — GetUp/Labor/Green left operative embedded at AGL — whowouldathunkit!!
Well, whowouldathunkit!! It is quite apparent that as a well credentialed, self described political strategist, Skye Laris ticks all the politically correct boxes of the Labor/Green left and we shouldn’t be at all surprised at her natural progression and career trajectory as a former ABC, GetUp, Climate Institute, and Labor Party operative, that she has now been able to be embed herself as an executive member, presumably driving policy, inside one of Australia’s largest energy outfits that derives much of its profits from coal fired electricity generation. It begs the question as to what strategies and whose interests she is pursuing and serving? Her own or the shareholders? Unfortunately, from here on in, anything and everything AGL says and does, with respect to energy policy, including their hipster television commercial, will now be viewed sceptically and through the prism of Skye Laris, with a high index and degree of suspicion.
Random Note #187,521– I thought Janet Albrechtsen was smarter than that
I thought Janet Albrechtsen was smarter than that. At what point and over what issue would she vote no? Because as sure as night follows day, five will get you ten that once gay marriage is a done deal, there will be all manner of clamouring and demands by others seeking the same privilege under the same ruse of “marriage equality.”
Random Note #196,428 Gay Marriage — The Bullying, Bludgeoning and Intimidating Template
As part of the push in the burgeoning industry of identity politics, gay marriage is just a dry run for bigger things. It has become a battering ram with all the powerful image values of barbarians at the gate that the phrase implies along with the predictable gaggle of useful idiots..
Random Note #189,683 — Australian History 101
It really takes a special degree of boneheaded ignorance and stupidity to be so ill informed as to basic Australian history. How is it at all possible for someone to be so ill informed as to historical facts on the ground to even get near a seat at the table and be on a Prime Ministers Advisory Council?